Tailwinds for MLPs?

Tailwinds for MLPs?

Regulatory delays for pipeline development are easing and drilling activity is increasing, which could have positive implications for MLPs in the energy sector.


We continue to believe Master Limited Partnerships (MLP) stocks at current levels are attractive on an absolute and relative basis. In contrast to utility and REIT stocks, MLP stocks continue to trade at valuation levels below historical averages.

The unexpected victory of Donald Trump in November’s presidential election initially boosted energy stocks, as a Trump presidency potentially has positive implications for MLP stocks over the next four years.

  • Within days of Trump’s inauguration, he signed two executive orders clearing regulatory delays for two large pipeline projects – the Dakota Access Pipeline and Keystone XL.
  • On February 28, in an address to Congress, President Trump outlined his vision of $1 trillion in infrastructure spending in the U.S. over the next 10 years – further bolstering the potential positive impacts of Trump’s presidency for MLP companies.
  • Delays in permitting new pipeline projects should become less of an issue in the Trump administration compared to the Obama administration.
  • Lead times to receive drilling well permits on U.S. federal lands increased during the Obama administration. A Trump presidency could see a more streamlined process for well permits, which could allow more development of federal lands, leading to increasing production and the need for incremental transportation infrastructure.
  • Trump campaigned on a vision of U.S. energy independence. He advocated increased drilling activity as a means to achieve this policy goal. An administration that encourages drilling activity will likely benefit energy MLP companies from the resultant need for transportation infrastructure.

 

 

U.S. Oil and Gas Rig Counts

Source: Bloomberg, as of 5/31/2017. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Please note that an investor cannot invest directly in an index. Unmanaged index returns do not reflect any fees, expenses or sales charges. This information is provided for illustrative purposes only and does not reflect the performance of an actual investment.


Following 10 consecutive years of growth, U.S. energy production declined by roughly 2.5% in 2016. Yet, MLP companies were able to grow distributions by 3% in 2016 with acquisitions more than offsetting the slight decline in infrastructure throughput volumes. In 2017, we expect U.S energy production to rebound. Drilling rig counts are a leading indicator for production volumes. Crude oil rig count is up 128% since June 2016 and natural gas rig count is up 122% since August 2016. Since drilling activity began recovering in mid-2016, U.S. oil production has increased from a low of 8.4 million barrels per day to 9.3 million barrels per day. We expect drilling rig counts to continue increasing over the balance of 2017, and U.S. energy production should continue to rise along with the rig count. Primary areas of production growth should be the Permian Basin (Texas), SCOOP/STACK (Oklahoma), Eagle Ford (Texas) and Marcellus (Pennsylvania).

The global oil market is on course to move from oversupplied to undersupplied. Global oil demand is expected to increase by 1.4 million barrels per day in 2017. OPEC is likely to cut output by roughly 1.5 million barrels per day throughout 2017 and non-OPEC production outside the U.S. is expected to be flat in 2017. This almost 3 million barrels per day tightening of supply/demand fundamentals is moving the oil market from oversupplied to undersupplied. This looming undersupply is a key reason oil prices have rebounded and is why we continue to believe that incremental U.S. oil barrels are needed to avert a shortage of oil.

OPEC’s recent action suggests a change in the organization’s strategy. Since OPEC was founded in 1960, the organization has managed production volumes (and resultant impact on oil prices) to maximize market share. OPEC’s recent actions to reduce output indicate an effort to maximize price – even if at the expense of market share. OPEC countries need at least $50 per barrel (and likely higher) oil prices to ensure economic stability in their countries. U.S. oil shale plays are economic at oil prices substantially lower than $50 per barrel. As a result, OPEC has realized they will lose market share over time to U.S. shale plays. OPEC is now acting to maximize the price of oil (and thus revenue) at the expense of market share. The initial public offering (IPO) of Saudi Aramco further incentivizes Saudi Arabia to ensure a high oil price to maximize pricing of the IPO. OPEC’s announced production cuts added roughly $10 per barrel to oil prices. Though its market share has been reduced, the production cut maximizes revenue for Saudi Arabia – positioning Saudi Aramco to receive a higher valuation when it goes public in 2018.

MLP distribution growth should remain intact. We estimate infrastructure MLP stocks will deliver roughly 6% distribution growth in 2017 following roughly 3% growth in 2016. Higher current yields, higher cash flow growth expectations, and lower valuations leave MLP stocks well positioned relative to utilities or REIT stocks, in our view.

 

Top

IMPORTANT INFORMATION: All investments involve risk, including loss of principal. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. An investor cannot invest directly in an index. Unmanaged index returns do not reflect any fees, expenses or sales charges.

Equity securities are subject to price fluctuation and possible loss of principal. Fixed-income securities involve interest rate, credit, inflation and reinvestment risks; and possible loss of principal. As interest rates rise, the value of fixed income securities falls. International investments are subject to special risks including currency fluctuations, social, economic and political uncertainties, which could increase volatility. These risks are magnified in emerging markets.

The opinions and views expressed herein are not intended to be relied upon as a prediction or forecast of actual future events or performance, guarantee of future results, recommendations or advice.  Statements made in this material are not intended as buy or sell recommendations of any securities. Forward-looking statements are subject to uncertainties that could cause actual developments and results to differ materially from the expectations expressed. This information has been prepared from sources believed reliable but the accuracy and completeness of the information cannot be guaranteed. Information and opinions expressed by either Legg Mason or its affiliates are current as at the date indicated, are subject to change without notice, and do not  take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situation or needs of individual investors.

Yields and dividends represent past performance and there is no guarantee they will continue to be paid.

A Master Limited Partnership (MLP) is a specialized type of corporation that is publicly traded, but structured to have earnings flow directly to participants, without first being taxed at the corporate level. However, a portion of the MLPs distribution may be subject to current income taxes. An investor may owe applicable taxes when the MLP is sold.

Investments in MLP securities are subject to unique risks, including the risks of concentrating investments in a specific sector, changes in government regulation, and changes in tax laws. MLP distributions are not guaranteed and are subject to change based on market or other conditions.

MLPs are not subject to double taxation. They do not pay any taxes at the company level but instead flow through any earnings or losses to the limited partners. This compares favorably to the C-Corporation legal structure which is subject to double taxation (once at the corporate level and once at the investor level). By not paying corporate-level taxes, this may make more cash available for payout to limited partners. 

Legg Mason, Inc., its affiliates, and its employees are not in the business of providing tax or legal advice to taxpayers. These materials and any tax-related statements are not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used or relied upon, by any such taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties or complying with any applicable tax laws or regulations. Tax-related statements, if any, may have been written in connection with the promotion or marketing of the transaction(s) or matter(s) addressed by these materials, to the extent allowed by applicable law. Any such taxpayer should seek advice based on the taxpayer's particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.