Policy changes that relax residency rules in smaller Chinese cities could become an important driver of structural growth, impacting a range of sectors.
Stamping the internal passport
Urbanisation, a key driver of economic growth in China, is set to be boosted by a new government policy. The National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) has recently announced a significant change in its residency registration system, known as Hukou.
The Hukou household system is effectively akin to an internal passport which controls the movement of labour and the allocation of human capital throughout the country. The system traces its history back to agricultural land management during the Shang Dynasty. However, it has maintained contemporary relevance as the means of an individual accessing social welfare benefits (including education, healthcare, and pensions) in the specific place where they are registered as living. Migrants who lack a local Hukou, therefore pay more for social services and have been prohibited from buying property in that area.
Smaller cities win
Smaller and medium-sized cities are designed to be main beneficiaries of the initiative. The 2019 plan requires that cities with populations between one and three million will lift the restrictive residency registration system to encourage rural citizens to move to them. Moreover, for cities with populations between three and five million, the government will also lower the threshold of residency requirements and remove limits on key population groups, such as university graduates.
Targeting the benefits
By relaxing the country’s residency rules, the Chinese government hopes to achieve several objectives. Firstly, it is expected to boost the current urbanisation rate, but in addition, reinvigorate cities which have experienced net outflows and ageing populations. This should also address an uneven distribution of labour – typically young and educated workers, converging disproportionally on China’s largest ‘Tier 1’ cities.
Secondly, improving social equality is an obvious subtext for the Chinese government. The existing Hukou restrictions have inevitably meant that migrant workers from rural areas are unable to access the same social benefits as their urban-registered counterparts, thus marginalising a large proportion of the country’s ‘floating population’. Social problems and reduced productivity have typically been cited as notable side-effects of the system.
There is also an expectation that the new policy will stimulate greater consumption. Urban populations have far larger disposable incomes and a higher propensity to consume, so bolstering city numbers should act as significant driver of economic growth.
Source: Statista and National Bureau of Statistics of China.
The investment perspective
The liberalised movement of labour and the social-reform elements of the policy should be beneficial from an economic perspective, as well as being positive for individuals and companies. However, the effects of this reform will also be impactful across a vast range of sectors. In particular, the requirements of increased urban populations will be a notable driver for physical and real assets such as infrastructure, real estate, utilities and essential services.
As such, we believe there are numerous companies that are likely to be a beneficiary of the change in Hukou. And we believe major policy amendments such as this announcement are significant because they can inevitably act as drivers of structural growth in the region. However, as bottom-up active managers we always view these changes through the lens of our company-specific research.
Discussions of individual securities are not intended and should not be relied upon as the basis to buy, sell or hold any security. Investors seeking financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any securities or investment strategies should consult their financial professional.
Investment in real estate entails significant risks and is suitable only for certain investors as part of an overall diversified investment strategy and only for investors able to withstand a total loss of investment.
Companies in the infrastructure industry may be subject to a variety of factors that could adversely affect their business or operations, including high interest costs in connection with capital construction programs, high degrees of leverage, costs associated with governmental, environmental and other regulations, the effects of economic slowdowns, increased competition from other providers of services, uncertainties concerning costs, the level of government spending on infrastructure projects, and other factors.
Any information, statement or opinion set forth herein is general in nature, is not directed to or based on the financial situation or needs of any particular investor, and does not constitute, and should not be construed as, investment advice, forecast of future events, a guarantee of future results, or a recommendation with respect to any particular security or investment strategy or type of retirement account. Investors seeking financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any securities or investment strategies should consult their financial professional.