Investment in new warehouse space, market proximity and relative costs have helped boost U.S. East Coast ports and inland hubs, particularly in the Southeast.
In the past decade, eastern U.S. industrial markets have gained considerable market share of the collective national trade volume. U.S. West Coast (USWC) port dominance has been gradually eroding as U.S. East Coast (USEC) ports capture more and more eastbound transpacific container trade (Figure 1). A number of structural factors have contributed to this ongoing shift, mainly:
- A significantly larger population in the Eastern U.S.
- Increasing demand from last-mile supply chains
- Shifting trade dynamics – most notably, U.S.–China trade policy and the opening of the Neopanamax Canal.
Recent demand indicators and investment performance have been strong at many high-growth eastern U.S. industrial hubs, many of which now report vacancy levels below 4.0%.
Clarion Partners estimates that at least another 1 billion square feet of new warehouse and distribution space will be delivered through 2025 to accommodate changing consumer behavior and demographic patterns -- and that 71% of this space will be in the Eastern U.S.
Figure 1: East, West, & Gulf Coast Share of TEU VOLUME
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation, Pacific Merchant Shipping Association (PMSA), March 2020. Note: 1) TEU volumes include imports and exports of loaded containers only. 2) Coastal groupings are based on PMSA groupings, which represent 90% of total U.S. TEU volume. 3) TEU = twenty-foot equivalent unit.1
Primary Causes of Regional Shifts
U.S. Population Divide
Currently, about 65% of Americans reside in the Eastern U.S.2 The vast majority (44 out of 64) of U.S. cities with a population over 1 million are in the Eastern U.S., while there are only 14 and 6 in the West and Central U.S., respectively (Figure 2).
Already-robust warehouse and distribution demand is now intensifying around the largest U.S. population clusters, as post-COVID 19 non-store shopping preferences are accelerating the pace of online sales growth.
Figure 2: 2019 State Populations: About 65% of Nation Resides in Eastern U.S
Last-Mile Supply Chain
Clarion Partners believes that expansion of Amazon.com alone is the most vivid illustration of the explosive dominance of e-commerce. The company now represents about 50% of all U.S. online sales, which grew at an annual pace of approximately 25% from 2015 to 20193. The most recent wave of U.S. e-commerce sales growth following the onset of COVID-19 has been more broad-based by retailer. In Q1 2020, annual online sales growth ﬁ gures for Amazon, Walmart, Lowe’s, Target, and Best Buy were 26%, 74%, 80%, 141%, and 155%, respectively.4 These growth metrics (excluding Amazon’s) were the highest on record in 20 years. The top 100 largest retailers also reported e-commerce sales growth year-over-year of over 70% in May and June.
The U.S. Census Bureau indicates that e-commerce sales still represent a mere 15% of total core U.S. retail sales. Using this calculation, we believe that we are about halfway through the build-out of the required e-commerce infrastructure if that share were to rise to 30% by 2030. This is a positive for new and existing warehouse demand serving last-mile industrial markets in large urban areas.
Shifting Trade Dynamics
U.S. state and metro-level growth trends are impacting global trade routes as well. Since the most recent economic expansion began in 2010, the gains made by the USEC and U.S. Gulf Coast (USGC) ports have accelerated; however, this shift has been two decades in the making. Recent TEU volume growth by region illustrates the long- and short-term shifts underway:
- During the 2000-2017 period, the total number of loaded containers moving through all USWC ports rose by only 64.4%, whereas USEC ports collectively reported a 126.9% jump. Even steeper was the 157.4% surge at USGC ports.5
- In 2019, inbound loaded TEU volume increased by over 350,000 at the nine East Coast ports and by over 80,000 in the Gulf Coast, where as it fell by over 660,000 at the five largest West Coast Ports.6
The eastward shift has occurred for a variety of reasons:
West Coast Ports: Restricted By Physical Growth, Higher Costs and Labor Disputes
At the primary USWC ports (Los Angeles/Long Beach, Seattle/Tacoma, and Oakland), available land is scarce and expensive. These ports have also lagged USEC counterparts in updating port infrastructure. At the same time, the high cost of doing business in California, which has strict environmental policies in place, has contributed to higher operating costs in much of the West. Furthermore, there have been periodic labor management issues. The longshore labor dispute, which began in 2012, substantially slowed container traffic through USWC ports.7
2016 Opening of the Widened Panama Canal
An increasingly large number of containers bound from East Asia to U.S. markets have been arriving at East and Gulf Coast ports. For many years, USWC ports dominated trade with the fast-growing economies of East Asia. By contrast, USEC ports primarily served trade with the more advanced and slower-growth economies of Europe.8 Following the Panama Canal expansion and re-opening in late 2016, the diversion of imports from East Asia to non-USWC North American ports accelerated. From 2016 to 2018, Panama Canal cargo tonnage grew by 25%.9 Nonetheless, since the onset of the U.S. -China trade war, traffic flows through the canal have moderated.
However, going forward, the Panama Canal is likely to be a key channel through which ship traffic arrives on the East Coast. In 2019, 66% of all cargo moving through the Panama Canal was either coming from, or going to, the East or Gulf Coasts of the U.S, while the Americas accounted for less than 10% of Suez Canal cargo traffic.10
Large Investments in East Coast Port Infrastructure
By 2019, most USEC ports had invested heavily in the physical infrastructure needed to support more international trade and larger ships. This has also contributed to the loss in USWC ports’ market shares in containerized import tonnage to those of East and Gulf Coast ports. According to the Pacific Merchant Shipping Association (PMSA), the transatlantic trade flows from the Europe, Middle East, and Asia (EMEA) region have remained relatively constant; however, more transpacific cargo has been re-routed to bypass USWC ports and go directly to the Eastern shoreline.
From 2010 to 2019, growth in containerized import cargo tonnage from East Asia by port and region has varied greatly, and the West Coast has fallen behind.
At the same time, industrial markets’ operating costs in the Southeast are still substantially lower than in the Northeast. In 2019, high-growth USEC ports by TEU volume included Miami, Savannah, Jacksonville (Jaxport), and South Carolina/Charleston (Figure 3).
Figure 3: 2019 Annual Growth in Individual Port TEU Volume
U.S.-China Tensions Leading to Trade Shifts
The recent U.S.–China trade war has somewhat distorted established trade patterns and alliances. Volumes of containerized trade through USWC ports from Asia have also been greatly reduced by rounds of new U.S. and retaliatory tariffs that were first imposed in 2018. Trade levels and partnerships throughout Asia have also begun to shift. According to AT Kearney, the conflict has spurred a sharp reversal in the reshoring index and supply chains as, specifically, imports from Mexico are growing and new lower cost trade partners in Southeast Asia are becoming more active.11
The fall-off in the USWC share of U.S. containerized import tonnage from East Asia has been significant. In 2004, the USWC share was 75.1%; by the end of 2019, it had plunged to 57.0%. Meanwhile, the USEC ports grew their share from 23.6% to 36.1%. USGC ports saw their share soar from 1.6% in 2003 to 7.0% last year.12 The drop in containerized import tonnage from East Asia has been most precipitous at the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach in recent years.
Post COVID-19 International Trade Policy Controls
Going forward, both ongoing trade tensions and COVID-19 are likely to lead to more near-shoring and on-shoring of consumer goods manufacturing. During Q1 2020, containerized trade was greatly impacted by the COVID-19 outbreak. The biggest five USWC ports’ combined share of all containerized import tonnage discharged at U.S. mainland ports fell from 37.9% in Q1 2019 to 33.4% in Q1 2020.13 However, we expect trade volume to recover as an effective vaccine or treatment is introduced globally.
We expect this recent shift in coastal volume will translate even more into stronger returns in the coming years at most large USEC ports.
Recent Outperformance of Eastern U.S. Industrial Submarkets
Over the past five years, the industrial NCREIF Property Index (NPI) return for the East region has been gradually accelerating and recently exceeded that of the West region over the past year (Figure 4). Outperforming markets recently have been Trenton, New York, Newark, Orlando, Baltimore and Boston, all generally linked to large and dense population centers.
Figure 4: NCREIF Industrial Returns by U.S. Region
Conclusion: Still More Growth Ahead
Over the past decade, U.S. eastern seaborne ports and inland hubs have invested in the necessary infrastructure for new warehouse space in order to boost and sustain trade volumes and generate new economic opportunity and business tax revenue for their respective states. These ports are likely closer to the ultimate destinations of the cargo and, at least for now, have a more attractive cost of doing business. The recent surge in activity at ports in Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina should bode well for future investment returns in these areas, as these states continue to capture more of the U.S. population.
Clarion Partners is optimistic about the long-term demand for industrial property in top U.S. port markets on the East, Gulf, and West Coasts alike, but nonetheless believes that new trade partnerships, routes, and production locations may beneﬁt East Coast industrial hubs to a greater extent.
1 Paciﬁc Merchant Shipping Association (PMSA) regions include the following markets: East – Baltimore, Boston, Brunswick, Charleston, Jacksonville, Miami, New York, Newport News and Norfolk (VA), Port Everglades, and Savannah; West – Long Beach, Los Angeles, Oakland, Seattle, and Tacoma; and Gulf – Houston and New Orleans.
2 Source: ESRI, Clarion Partners Investment Research, Q1 2020.
3 Amazon Annual Reports, E-Marketer. June 2020. Note: Amazon share of total e-commerce excludes all private companies.
4 Forbes. Q1 2020.
5 PMSA. Brieﬁng Paper: Loss of Market Share at U.S. West Coast Ports. June 2020.
6 Ibid. Note: Five largest U.S. West Coast ports include Los Angeles, Long Beach, Oakland, Tacoma, & Seattle.
7 PMSA. Brieﬁng Paper: Loss of Market Share at U.S. West Coast Ports. June 2020.
10 Suez Canal Authority, Panama Canal. Statistics and Models Management Unit (MEEM), Georgia Tech Logistics Innovation and Research Center, Clarion Partners Investment Research. Q1 2020.
11 AT Kearney. Trade War Spurs Sharp Reversal in 2019 Reshoring Index, Foreshadowing COVID-19 test of Supply Chain Resilience. June 2020.
12 PMSA. Brieﬁng Paper: Loss of Market Share at U.S. West Coast Ports. June 2020.
A twenty-foot equivalent unit (TEU) is a general unit of measure of cargo capacity for shipping containers.
Neopanamax Canal refers to new, larger standards for container ship size made possible by the recent enlargement of the Panama Canal.
The NCREIF Property Index (NPI) provides returns for institutional grade real estate held in a fiduciary environment in the United States. Properties are managed by investment fiduciaries on behalf of tax-exempt pension funds.
Forecasts are inherently limited and should not be relied upon as indicators of actual or future performance.
All investments involve risk, including possible loss of principal.
The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested, and can be affected by changes in interest rates, in exchange rates, general market conditions, political, social and economic developments and other variable factors. Investment involves risks including but not limited to, possible delays in payments and loss of income or capital. Neither Legg Mason nor any of its affiliates guarantees any rate of return or the return of capital invested.
Equity securities are subject to price fluctuation and possible loss of principal. Fixed-income securities involve interest rate, credit, inflation and reinvestment risks; and possible loss of principal. As interest rates rise, the value of fixed income securities falls.
International investments are subject to special risks including currency fluctuations, social, economic and political uncertainties, which could increase volatility. These risks are magnified in emerging markets.
Commodities and currencies contain heightened risk that include market, political, regulatory, and natural conditions and may not be suitable for all investors.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Please note that an investor cannot invest directly in an index. Unmanaged index returns do not reflect any fees, expenses or sales charges.
The opinions and views expressed herein are not intended to be relied upon as a prediction or forecast of actual future events or performance, guarantee of future results, recommendations or advice. Statements made in this material are not intended as buy or sell recommendations of any securities. Forward-looking statements are subject to uncertainties that could cause actual developments and results to differ materially from the expectations expressed. This information has been prepared from sources believed reliable but the accuracy and completeness of the information cannot be guaranteed. Information and opinions expressed by either Legg Mason or its affiliates are current as at the date indicated, are subject to change without notice, and do not take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situation or needs of individual investors.
The information in this material is confidential and proprietary and may not be used other than by the intended user. Neither Legg Mason or its affiliates or any of their officer or employee of Legg Mason accepts any liability whatsoever for any loss arising from any use of this material or its contents. This material may not be reproduced, distributed or published without prior written permission from Legg Mason. Distribution of this material may be restricted in certain jurisdictions. Any persons coming into possession of this material should seek advice for details of, and observe such restrictions (if any).
This material may have been prepared by an advisor or entity affiliated with an entity mentioned below through common control and ownership by Legg Mason, Inc. Unless otherwise noted the "$" (dollar sign) represents U.S. Dollars.
This material is only for distribution in those countries and to those recipients listed.
All investors and eligible counterparties in EU and EEA countries:
In Europe (excluding UK and Switzerland), this financial promotion is issued by Legg Mason Investments (Ireland) Limited, registered office Floor 6, Building Three, Number One, Ballsbridge, 126 Pembroke Road, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4. D04 EP27, Ireland. Registered in Ireland, Company No. 271887. Authorised and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland.
In the UK, this financial promotion is issued by Legg Mason Investments (Europe) Limited, registered office 201 Bishopsgate, London EC2M 3AB. Registered in England and Wales, Company No. 1732037. Authorized and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority.
In Switzerland, this financial promotion is issued by Legg Mason Investments (Switzerland) GmbH.
Investors in Switzerland: The representative in Switzerland is FIRST INDEPENDENT FUND SERVICES LTD., Klausstrasse 33, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland and the paying agent in Switzerland is NPB Neue Privat Bank AG, Limmatquai 1, 8024 Zurich, Switzerland. Copies of the Articles of Association, the Prospectus, the Key Investor Information documents and the annual and semi-annual reports of the Company may be obtained free of charge from the representative in Switzerland.
All Investors in Hong Kong and Singapore:
This material is provided by Legg Mason Asset Management Hong Kong Limited in Hong Kong and Legg Mason Asset Management Singapore Pte. Limited (Registration Number (UEN): 200007942R) in Singapore.
This material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in Hong Kong or Singapore.
All Investors in the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”):
This material is provided by Legg Mason Asset Management Hong Kong Limited to intended recipients in the PRC. The content of this document is only for Press or the PRC investors investing in the QDII Product offered by PRC’s commercial bank in accordance with the regulation of China Banking Regulatory Commission. Investors should read the offering document prior to any subscription. Please seek advice from PRC’s commercial banks and/or other professional advisors, if necessary. Please note that Legg Mason and its affiliates are the Managers of the offshore funds invested by QDII Products only. Legg Mason and its affiliates are not authorized by any regulatory authority to conduct business or investment activities in China.
This material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in the PRC.
Distributors and existing investors in Korea and Distributors in Taiwan:
This material is provided by Legg Mason Asset Management Hong Kong Limited to eligible recipients in Korea and by Legg Mason Investments (Taiwan) Limited (Registration Number: (109) Jin Guan Tou Gu Xin Zi Di 016; Address: Suite E, 55F, Taipei 101 Tower, 7, Xin Yi Road, Section 5, Taipei 110, Taiwan, R.O.C.; Tel: (886) 2-8722 1666) in Taiwan. Legg Mason Investments (Taiwan) Limited operates and manages its business independently.
This material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in Korea or Taiwan.
All Investors in the Americas:
This material is provided by Legg Mason Investor Services LLC, a U.S. registered Broker-Dealer, which includes Legg Mason Americas International. Legg Mason Investor Services, LLC, Member FINRA/SIPC, and all entities mentioned are subsidiaries of Legg Mason, Inc.
All Investors in Australia and New Zealand:
This document is issued by Legg Mason Asset Management Australia Limited (ABN 76 004 835 839, AFSL 204827). The information in this document is of a general nature only and is not intended to be, and is not, a complete or definitive statement of matters described in it. It has not been prepared to take into account the investment objectives, financial objectives or particular needs of any particular person.
The aforementioned Legg Mason entities are wholly owned subsidiaries of Franklin Resources, Inc.